Faculty Consulting Activities and Agreements
Consulting activities may give rise to conflict of commitment and conflict of interest concerns and have become subject to increased scrutiny by the University, the State of California, Congress and other federal agencies, and the general public. To assist faculty in their review of consulting agreements, UCLA’s Technology Development Group has prepared a list of Frequently Asked Questions.
Please note consulting agreements are personal agreements between the outside organization and the faculty consultant, to which the University is not a party. In view of this, UCLA staff cannot provide faculty with personal legal advice, nor can they act on behalf of individual faculty to negotiate the terms of a consulting agreement. Therefore, we recommend that you seek legal counsel to assist with the review of any consulting agreement that you are asked to sign.
For a detailed explanation of your obligations to the University in view of your outside activities, please see General University Policy APM – 025 Regarding Academic Appointees, Conflict of Commitment and Outside Activities of Faculty Members (PDF) . If you are part of the HSCP (Health Sciences Compensation Plan), please also see APM 671 Conflict of Commitment and Outside Activities of Health Sciences Compensation Plan Participants (PDF) .
If -- after reviewing APM – 025 (and APM – 671, if applicable to you) and the following FAQs -- you have any specific questions regarding your obligations to disclose and assign intellectual property to the University, please contact UCLA’s Technology Development Group at contracts@tdg.ucla.edu